Also this is a comparison of a kid to a grown woman...lol that just doesn't work. If you are going to compare, make a comparison of a grown adult to a grown adult. The only right thing about this post is Gaga being 18 or 19 in 2004. As I stated previously that's the age with which women stop growing (physically).

....these kinds of post about Gaga are dumb. Sorry. She's not even that old for these comparisons to start. In 2004 she would've been what? 19? She's turning 30 this year. She was barely a legal adult in 2004, not even the legal drinking age xD LOL I'm 19 rn so ofc when I get older I'm going to look the same now as I do when I'm thirty but just with a more mature look. Girls generally stop growing (physically) at the age of 18. From that point into adulthood we don't change that much. This kind of post would be more relevant in 22 years from now bc at that point most women would age (physically). Doing a side by side comparison of Gaga at the age of 30 & Gaga at 55. Saying she STILL looks so youthful, beautiful, & healthy as she did at 29, at the age of 55. IMHO. :)